Progress Publishing Co.

 Hole Card and Hit Card Prediction in Blackjack

 

HOME Craps Home Slots Home Cards Gambling History Monte Carlo
Roulette History Roulette Rules Roulette Systems Baccarat History Baccarat Rules Baccarat Systems
Keno History Keno Rules Keno Play Blackjack History Blackjack Rules Basic Strategy
Expectations Card Counting Efficiency Betting Spread Shoe Penetration New Blackjack
Bingo History Bingo Basics Bingo Rules Bingo Games Bingo Odds Lottery History
Horse Racing History Horse Racing Types Horse Races Horse Racing Betting Handicapping Horse Racing Glossary
Horse Racing Rules Greyhound History Greyhound Betting Greyhound Program Dog Handicapping Greyhound Grading
Greyhound Rules Greyhound Glossary Jai Alai History Jai Alai Rules Jai Alai Betting  Jai Alai Glossary
Football History Football Point Spread Football Handicapping Football Betting Football Rules Football Glossary
Poker History Poker Betting Poker Outs Poker Pot Odds Poker Position Poker Free Card Strategy
Holdem Poker Glossary Hole Card ORDER Links    

 

  cndl_grn4_md_blk.gif (2968 bytes)   BookBlack3D.gif (7788 bytes) cndl_grn4_md_blk.gif (2968 bytes)

Hole Card and Hit Card

Prediction in Blackjack

(Excerpt)

*******************************************************************

Hole Card and Hit Card Strategies

Hole Card and Hit Card Reading

Minimal Accuracy Requirements for Hole Card reading (prediction)

Minimal Accuracy Requirements for Hit Card Reading (prediction)

*******************************************************************

Hole Card and Hit Card Strategies

Many players disillusioned with a losing performance by the card counting systems especially against multiple deck games tried the different methods focused on a hole card of a dealer and the hit cards for a player and a dealer. The players considered that approach to be more effective because it was focusing on “the situation at hand”. Instead of relying on the general knowledge delivered by a card counting about the relative excesses or deficits of the high and low cards in the vast mass of the cards in “the rest of the deck”, they were more interested in analyzing the current round. They argued that high positive or negative counts often misled a player about the cards coming in the next round or even next few rounds. The result was many incorrect playing and betting decisions. By studying the flow of the cards inside the round they tried to come up with the strategies, which could produce more precise playing decisions. Those strategies were based on the hole card and hit card prediction (reading, anticipation, recognition etc…).

Hole Card and Hit Card Prediction

An ability to derive some knowledge about a hole card or coming hit cards is something every player obviously would want to have. The information about a hole card or hit cards would give a player a basis for a correct deviation from Basic Strategy playing decisions by far superior to that of the card counting.

In the 1960s and 1970s there were many attempts by the players to get hole card related information. The players tried to take advantage of a sloppy work by the dealer when he was dealing cards or checking under his ace or a ten for a possible blackjack. The methods included psychology-based reading of the dealer’s “tells”, analyzing bent by the dealer’s cards (Wong’s “Warp” method”),  “spooking” from behind of a dealer and “front-loading” from the front to get a peak at the hole card and using “shiners” to get a reflection of the hole card. All these methods are obsolete now and can not be used in principle in the shoe games. A dealer does not check anymore under an ace or a ten and lets photo elements to do the work. In the shoe games the dealers don’t deal from the hand but slide the cards from the shoe over the surface of the table making it impossible to peak under the cards.  The only possible way left to get any idea about the hole card is to make a probability-based prediction.

The hole card reading (prediction, anticipation, recognition etc…) does not have to be 100% correct to be effective. For ex, if a player has a stiff hand of 16 versus a dealer’s 10 up card and reads a hole card to be a low card (2, 3, 4, 5 or a 6) he only needs to be more than roughly 41.5% of the time correct to make a deviation from Basic Strategy and stand instead of hitting. If he is correct only 48% of the time – that means he is wrong more often than not about low value of the hole card – he’ll still be correct to stand instead of hitting contrary to the Basic Strategy recommendation of hitting. Standing with 48% accurate hole card prediction (reading) will improve his expectation on this play by +0.056 in comparison with hitting recommendation by Basic Strategy. His disadvantage will be improved by 5.6% and he will lose on average 5.6 cents less on every dollar bet in that scenario.

Minimal Accuracy Requirements for Hole Card reading

Table 1 shows minimal accuracy for a hole card prediction (reading) required for deviation from Basic Strategy when a player has a stiff hand against a dealer high up card (7, 8, 9 or a 10) in a 6-deck game. The numbers are approximate and can be used as the good references for any shoe game.

Table 1. Deviation from the Basic Strategy on the basis of hole card reading – standing instead of hitting.

 

Player’s Hand

Dealer’s Up Card

10

9

8

7

16

41.5%

46.71%

50.83%

55.42%

15

47.88%

54.84%

61.37%

70.44%

14

55.3%

63.81%

72.31%

84.43%

13

64.05%

73.65%

83.53%

97.82%

12

74.34%

84.4%

95.06%

 

 

 

 

For ex. to stand with 15 against a dealer’s 8 up card, a player must be more than roughly 61.37% correct in his hole card prediction (reading). Some numbers in this table present only a theoretical interest. The table shows that accuracy of the hole card prediction (reading) should be more than roughly 97.82% for a player to stand on 13 against 8 up card. It’s very unlikely that the hole card reading (prediction) methods capable of that kind of accuracy will ever be devised.

Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 below show minimal accuracy in the hole card prediction (reading) required for deviation from Basic Strategy decisions in all other Blackjack situations. The deviations include hitting instead of doubling; splitting instead of hitting; doubling instead of hitting or standing when a player has soft hands, pairs or doubling hands. As you can see there are more than 50 possible theoretical deviations from Basic Strategy on the basis of the hole card reading (prediction)………………………………………………………………..

Minimal Accuracy Requirements for Hit Card reading

Similar minimal requirements necessary for the deviation from Basic Strategy exist for the hit cards prediction. Again, a player does not have to be 100% correct with his hit card anticipation. For ex. a player has a stiff hand with a hand value of 16 against a dealer’s 10 up card. If his prediction of a high (7, 8, 9, 10 or an ACE) hit card is roughly more than 62% he can deviate from Basic Strategy and stand instead of hitting to avoid a possible bust. Suppose a player is correct 65% in his hit card prediction (reading). If he’ll stand instead of hitting, he’ll improve his expectation on this play by roughly +0.034%. His disadvantage will be less by 3.4% and he’ll lose 3.4 cents less on the average dollar bet in this scenario. Table 7 below shows minimal accuracy for a hit card prediction (reading) required for a player with a stiff hand to deviate from Basic Strategy when a dealer has a high up card.

Table 7. Deviation from the Basic Strategy on the basis of a hit card prediction – standing instead of hitting.

 

Player’s Hand

Dealer’s Up Card

10

9

8

7

16

62%

64.6%

65.9%

66.6%

15

64.7%

67.4%

68.5%

68.8%

14

74.2%

78.04%

78.53%

78.04%

 

  ...................................................................................................................................

Copyright Progress Publishing Co.